1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 415 F.Supp.
  5. 415 F.Supp. 421 (1976)
 

FRA S. p. A. v. SURG-O-FLEX OF AMERICA, INC.

No. 75 Civ. 3363 (CHT).

415 F.Supp. 421 (1976)

FRA S. p. A. et al., Plaintiffs, v. SURG-O-FLEX OF AMERICA, INC. and Joseph Ventura, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 17, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pavia & Harcourt, New York City, for plaintiffs; Frances B. Bernstein, New York City, of counsel.

Dahan & Appel, New York City, for defendants; Paul H. Appel, New York City, of counsel.

TENNEY, District Judge.

Defendants have moved this Court pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order dismissing substantial portions of the plaintiffs' complaint; an order striking certain counts of the complaint; an order for a more definite statement as to the counts not dismissed or stricken; an order pursuant to Rule 2 and Rule 15 of the Civil Rules of the Southern District of New York directing plaintiff FRA S.p.A. to file a security...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases