1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 71 N.J.
  5. 71 N.J. 8 (1976)
 

STATE v. SAYKO

71 N.J. 8 (1976)

362 A.2d 549

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CARL G. SAYKO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 28, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul A. Massaro, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Massaro, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Edward W. McGrath, Union County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Robert E. Rochford, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Division of Criminal Justice (Mr. Rochford, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Herman W. Kapp argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Richard M. Eaton, on the brief; Messrs. Kapp & Finkel, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation and application of section 27 of the New Jersey Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, N.J.S.A. 24:21-1 et seq.,1 the same statutory provision involved in State v. Alston, 70 N.J. 95 (1976) also decided this day.

Defendant Carl G. Sayko pleaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases