1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 428 U.S.
  5. 428 U.S. 364 (1976)
 

SOUTH DAKOTA v. OPPERMAN

No. 75-76.

428 U.S. 364 (1976)

96 S.Ct. 3092

49 L.Ed.2d 1000

SOUTH DAKOTA v. OPPERMAN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided July 6, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Janklow, Attorney General of South Dakota, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Earl R. Mettler, Assistant Attorney General.

Robert C. Ulrich, by appointment of the Court, 423 U.S. 1012, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Lee M. McCahren and John F. Hagemann.*

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court.

We review the judgment of the Supreme Court of South Dakota, holding that local police violated the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, as applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment, when they conducted a routine inventory search of an automobile lawfully impounded by police for violations of municipal parking ordinances.

(1)

Local ordinances prohibit parking in certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases