BROCK, Chief Judge.
Prior to testimony identifying defendant as the robber, defendant objected and moved to suppress identification testimony and testimony of the lineup identification. A voir dire was conducted upon the competency of the testimony.
From competent evidence the trial judge determined that the in-court identification of defendant as the robber stemmed solely from the witnesses' observation of defendant at the scene of the crime and was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
