1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 138 N.J.
  5. 138 N.J. Super. 575 (1976)
 

STATE v. RODRIQUEZ

138 N.J. Super. 575 (1976)

351 A.2d 784

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SANTOS RODRIQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 23, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald D. Miller argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Miller, Hochman, Meyerson & Miller, attorneys).

Mr. John Tomasin, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Hudson County Counsel, and Mr. James T. O'Halloran, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorneys; Mr. M.J. Frank, Assistant County Counsel, and Mr. Gary Newman, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and KING.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for the return of $11,036.92 seized in a gambling raid. All charges were dismissed against defendant. The matter was first on appeal in State v. Rodririquez, 130 N.J.Super. 57 (App. Div. 1974), certif. den. 66 N.J. 325 (1974). Thus, we need not repeat the factual background detailed in that opinion. Since the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases