1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. T.C.M.
  4. 35 T.C.M.
  5. 35 T.C.M. 627 (1976)
 

LISLE v. COMMISSIONER

Docket Nos. 1760-73, 1849-73, 1851-73, 1852-73.

35 T.C.M. 627 (1976)

T.C. Memo. 1976-140

Claude J. Lisle and Vi Lisle, et al. v. Commissioner.

United States Tax Court.

Filed May 4, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Truman F. Campbell, Campbell and McFeeters, 730 L. St., counsel for petitioners in docket No. 1760-73. Kendall L. Manock and Robert Fishman, Security Bank Bldg., counsel for petitioners in docket No. 1849-73. Baxter K. Richardson, Richardson and Gaskill, 914 Helm Bldg., 1111 Fulton Mall, counsel for petitioners in docket Nos. 1851-73 and 1852-73. Edward B. Simpson, for the respondent.

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

GOFFE, Judge:

The Commissioner determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax as follows:

                      Docket
     Petitioners        No.     Year   Deficiency

  Claude J. and VI
   Lisle ........... 1760-73   1968   $ 1,778.47
                               1969     1,822.55
                               1970     9,158.00
  Joel R. and Helen
   Lisle ........... 1849-73 ...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases