1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 410 F.Supp.
  5. 410 F.Supp. 244 (1976)
 

ROTHSTEIN v. SEIDMAN & SEIDMAN

Nos. 73 Civ. 2127, 73 Civ. 2129 to 73 Civ. 2132.

410 F.Supp. 244 (1976)

Morris ROTHSTEIN et al., Plaintiffs, v. SEIDMAN & SEIDMAN et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. AXELROD & CO. et al., Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

February 27, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hawkins, Delafield & Wood, New York City, for plaintiffs Morris Rothstein, Jack Rothstein, Joel Rothstein, Saul Golkin and Sheila Barschi; Clarence Fried, John F. Triggs, New York City, of counsel.

Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York City, for defendant Seidman & Seidman; William E. Hegarty, John R. Vaughan, Wayne Schneider, Joseph W. Muccia, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

The defendant Seidman and Seidman ("Seidman") moves to dismiss various claims of amended complaints in five related actions1 upon the ground that they either fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or fail to plead fraud with particularity as required by Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases