1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 142 N.J.
  5. 142 N.J. Super. 492 (1976)
 

VEDUTIS v. SO. PLAINFIELD BD. OF ED.

142 N.J. Super. 492 (1976)

362 A.2d 51

DONNA VEDUTIS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROBERT VEDUTIS AND ROBERT VEDUTIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 15, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert F. Colquhoun, attorney for the appellant.

Messrs. Mulligan & Altman, attorneys for the respondents.

Before Judges KOLE, ARD and E. GAULKIN.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Demos, which was approved in Rost v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed., 137 N.J.Super. 76 (App. Div. 1975).

In view of our disposition of the matter, we need not consider the issue of informal or substantial compliance which was also raised on this appeal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases