1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 71 N.J.
  5. 71 N.J. 539 (1976)
 

MEADE v. KINGS SUPERMARKET-ORANGE

71 N.J. 539 (1976)

366 A.2d 978

JOHN MEADE AND ELEANOR MEADE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. KINGS SUPERMARKET-ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 30, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. D.F. Moore Craig argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Bracken and Craig, attorneys).

Mr. Herbert C. Klein argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

After a jury trial plaintiffs were awarded damages on account of personal injuries sustained when Mrs. Meade was struck by a line of shopping carts and propelled through a plate glass window as she and her husband were leaving defendant's store premises. Mr. Meade likewise suffered injuries from falling glass when he went to his wife's assistance. The Appellate Division reversed the judgments entered in plaintiffs' favor, relying in part on Znoski v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases