1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 138 N.J.
  5. 138 N.J. Super. 456 (1976)
 

MELVENEY v. McCRANE

138 N.J. Super. 456 (1976)

351 A.2d 385

KENNETH A. MELVENEY AND NATALIE MELVENEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOHN McCRANE AND BEATRICE McCRANE, DEFENDANTS, BERTHA M. O'DONNELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, FRANKLIN D. SOGORKA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Neil I. Kilstein argued the cause for the defendant-appellant Bertha M. O'Donnell (Messrs. Kreiger, Karas & Kilstein, attorneys).

Mr. Daniel Crystal argued the cause for the plaintiffs-respondents, Kenneth A. Melveney and Natalie Melveney (Messrs. Cohn & Lifland, attorneys).

Mr. Lester E. Fetell argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Franklin D. Sogorka.

Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MILMED, J.A.D.

Defendant Bertha M. O'Donnell appeals from a judgment entered on two jury verdicts rendered against her — one for $2,500 in favor of plaintiffs Kenneth A. Melveney and Natalie Melveney, and the other for $8,000 in favor of defendant Franklin D. Sogorka. The factual situation as disclosed by the proofs may be briefly summarized.

Defendants John and Beatrice McCrane owned a one-family house at 610...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases