1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 396 Mich.
  5. 396 Mich. 169 (1976)
 

TUCSON v. FARRINGTON

Docket No. 56276, (Calendar No. 10).

396 Mich. 169 (1976)

240 N.W.2d 464

TUCSON v. FARRINGTON

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 1, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Rubiner and Arthur James Rubiner for plaintiffs.

Bush, Luce, Henderson, Black & Bankson (Eugene F. Black, of counsel) for defendants.

Decided April 1, 1976. Rehearing denied 396 Mich. 992.

FITZGERALD, J.

Plaintiffs Tucson sued defendants Farrington for specific performance. Based on plaintiffs' exhibit 1,1 the trial court found that an enforceable agreement for the sale of defendants' farm existed and entered a judgment for the equitable relief requested. The Court of Appeals, at 53 Mich.App. 149; 218...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases