1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 57 Cal.App.3d
  5. 57 Cal.App.3d 497 (1976)
 

PEOPLE EX REL. CAMIL v. BUENA VISTA CINEMA

Docket Nos. 46918, 46919.

57 Cal.App.3d 497 (1976)

129 Cal. Rptr. 315

THE PEOPLE ex rel. WILLIAM CAMIL, as City Attorney, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BUENA VISTA CINEMA et al., Defendants and Respondents. CITY OF DUARTE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BUENA VISTA CINEMA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

April 21, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William Camil, City Attorney, in pro. per., and James J. Clancy for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lappen, Abelson & Harris and Jonathan Bailey Lappen for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

COMPTON, J.

The City of Duarte (plaintiff)1 instituted two separate actions in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to abate a public nuisance. Both actions were directed against Buena Vista Cinema,2 a motion picture theater situated in the City of Duarte, where, according to the allegations of the complaint, obscene motion pictures were continuously exhibited....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases