1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 139 N.J.
  5. 139 N.J. Super. 389 (1976)
 

STATE v. BASKERVILLE

139 N.J. Super. 389 (1976)

354 A.2d 328

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VINCENT BASKERVILLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 28, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Eric A. Summerville argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Richard Mackay, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. James T. O'Halloran, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, LORA and MORGAN.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Baskerville and one Decker were indicted by a Hudson County grand jury for armed robbery. When the indictment was first listed for trial Decker moved for a severance on the ground that the results of a polygraph examination administered to Baskerville would be introduced into evidence. After ruling that the admissibility of polygraph results was not limited to impeachment purposes only, the trial judge granted the severance. Decker was thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases