1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 420 F.Supp.
  5. 420 F.Supp. 46 (1976)
 

UNITED STATES v. STONEHILL

Civ. No. 65-127-GJS.

420 F.Supp. 46 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Harry S. STONEHILL et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C. D. California.

July 23, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Magnuson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Stanley F. Krysa, Arthur L. Biggins, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Trammell, Rand, Nathan & Lincoln, Washington, D.C., Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, Long Beach, Cal., for defendants Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks.

Ted T. Ward, Winkler & Ward, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Lourdes B. Stonehill.

OPINION

SOLOMON, District Judge.

I. Preliminary Statement

This is an action to foreclose federal tax liens of about $25 million.

Defendants Harry S. Stonehill and Robert P. Brooks (the taxpayers) are United States citizens who settled in the Philippines after World War II. They became successful and powerful businessmen. They owned, were officers of, or controlled many business organizations and were active in Philippine politics...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases