1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 425 F.Supp.
  5. 425 F.Supp. 13 (1976)
 

KELLY v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

Civ. A. No. 73-51.

425 F.Supp. 13 (1976)

David KELLY and William Kelly, Individually and trading as Kelly's Bustleton Esso, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

December 31, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell A. Kramer, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Ira P. Tiger, Philadelphia, Pa., for General Motors Corp.

Robert C. Heim, Philadelphia, Pa., for Ford.

Robert S. Ryan, Philadelphia, Pa., for Chrysler and Amer. Motors.

OPINION AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

Plaintiff William Kelly has filed this monumentally ambitious antitrust suit against all four American automobile manufacturers. Kelly is the sole proprietor1 of Kelly's Bustleton Exxon Station in Northeast Philadelphia, and he seeks to represent in this lawsuit a nationwide class of all automobile repair entities other than defendants' authorized new car dealers.2<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases