U. C. B. R. v. MOLITORIS, ET AL.

Nos. 215, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341 and 342 C.D. 1975.

24 Pa.Commw. 360 (1976)

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward M. Molitoris, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John Mikovich, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Russell C. Younkins, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Calvin D. Franks, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John M. Noska, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Margaret Nagg, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Margaret Nagg, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Steve Karlock, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Andrew G. Sibula, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Andrew G. Sibula, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Andrew G. Sibula, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward M. Molitoris, Appellant. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward M. Molitoris, Appellant.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

April 22, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan Epstein, with him Freedman, Borowsky and Lorry, for appellants.

Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Attorney General, with him Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert P. Kane, Attorney General, for appellee.

Argued February 6, 1976, before Judges CRUMLISH, JR., WILKINSON, JR., and MENCER, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE CRUMLISH, JR., April 22, 1976:

Edward M. Molitoris and others1 (Claimants) have appealed the orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied them benefits. The factual posture and legal issues are similar in these claims and they were therefore consolidated for our determination.

Claimants were last employed by the river division...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases