1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 139 N.J.
  5. 139 N.J. Super. 142 (1976)
 

CIPPARULO v. DAVID FRIEDLAND PAINTING CO.

139 N.J. Super. 142 (1976)

353 A.2d 105

ALEX CIPPARULO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DAVID FRIEDLAND PAINTING CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jack Wysoker argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mandel, Wysoker, Sherman, Glassner, Weingartner & Feingold, attorneys).

Mr. Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weltchek, Prupis & Ritz, attorneys).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, LORA and MORGAN.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action brought under the New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act (PWA), N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.25 et seq., by plaintiff as business representative of Painters Local 480 and on behalf of Local 480 members who worked for defendant, a subcontractor on three Rutgers University public projects in Piscataway, New Jersey. The trial judge, sitting without a jury, decided for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

Defendant (Friedland) is a union painting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases