CLAY v. BRADLEY

No. 733 (1974).

74 Wis.2d 153 (1976)

246 N.W.2d 142

CLAY, Respondent, v. BRADLEY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 19, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Gavic, Richardson & Skow of Spring Valley, and oral argument by Robert J. Richardson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Doar, Drill, Norman & Bakke of New Richmond, and oral argument by James A. Drill.


DAY, J.

The principal questions on this appeal are first, whether a contract for the sale of real estate was vitiated under the statute of frauds because the land description was indefinite and second, whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's award of damages. Other issues are discussed in this opinion.

The appeal is from a judgment supporting an award of damages by a jury in favor of the respondent-purchaser ("plaintiff") under a purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases