1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 144 N.J.
  5. 144 N.J. Super. 74 (1976)
 

FIORE v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

144 N.J. Super. 74 (1976)

364 A.2d 572

ANTHONY FIORE, PLAINTIFF, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, ALBERT MONGELUZZO AND ROBERT BERRY, JR., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided August 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael Vannella for plaintiff (Messrs. Lipman, Antonelli, Batt & Dunlap, attorneys).

Mr. Bennett I. Bardfeld for defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company.

MILLER, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.

This is an action wherein defendant moves for summary judgment on one of four counts of a complaint on the grounds that the count fails to state a cause of action. This count alleges that plaintiff has undergone extreme mental anguish as a result of (1) defendant's failure to conform to its guarantee with respect to the installation of a roof and the multiple efforts made by him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases