1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 423 F.Supp.
  5. 423 F.Supp. 1302 (1976)
 

AMBURN v. HAROLD FORSTER INDUSTRIES, LTD.

Civ. A. No. 76-71002.

423 F.Supp. 1302 (1976)

Raymond D. AMBURN and Agro-Magnetics, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. HAROLD FORSTER INDUSTRIES, LTD. and Qsine Corporation, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

December 14, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen E. Perry and Ernie L. Brooks, Southfield, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Emmett E. Eagan, Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS OF DEFENDANTS

CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, District Judge.

The defendants in this action, two Canadian corporations, have moved for dismissal for lack of jurisdiction over the person of either defendant.

Plaintiffs are a Michigan resident and a Michigan corporation, the patentee and exclusive licensee of a patent on a device which magnetically treats seeds to attempt to increase crop yields. Defendants are accused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases