In this article 78 proceeding, petitioners challenge respondents' determination denying seniority credit for continuous substitute services rendered under per diem certificates as being arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and move for related relief. Respondents moved to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd [f]) on the grounds that the petition fails to state a cause of action.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.