1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 417 F.Supp.
  5. 417 F.Supp. 1030 (1976)
 

ARTMARK CHICAGO, LTD. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 4654, Court No. 73-3-00816.

417 F.Supp. 1030 (1976)

ARTMARK CHICAGO, LTD. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court.

June 7, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz & Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill. (Thomas J. O'Donnell, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Rex E. Lee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C. (Saul Davis and Glenn E. Harris, New York City, trial attys.), for defendant.

FORD, Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of plastic horse figures approximately 10 inches high, composed in chief value of plastic, having removable plastic saddles and metal reins. The merchandise was classified as toy figures of animate objects under provision of item 737.40, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, and assessed with duty at the rate of 21 or 17.5 per...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases