1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 420 F.Supp.
  5. 420 F.Supp. 944 (1976)
 

LONDON v. LONDON

No. 76 Civ. 18(MP).

420 F.Supp. 944 (1976)

Mellanie LONDON, Plaintiff, v. Martin LONDON, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

October 12, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malcolm H. Bell, Norwalk, Conn., Charles J. Hecht, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for defendant by Mark Alcott, New York City.

OPINION

POLLACK, District Judge.

Defendant has moved for an order dismissing the complaint, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The parties have submitted affidavits which to the extent they are not in conflict have been considered together with the complaint. Rule 56.

This case is a supplement to the matrimonial disharmony of the parties over...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases