1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 536 S.W.2d
  5. 536 S.W.2d 697 (1976)
 

VAN MARION v. MOSELEY

No. 75-294.

536 S.W.2d 697 (1976)

Jacob VAN MARION et ux., Appellants, v. L. A. MOSELEY et ux., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

May 10, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon & Gordon, Morrilton, for appellant.

William Cree, Jr., Morrilton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Following our affirmance of the chancery court's decree pursuant to Rule 9(e)(2), appellants moved for permission for their attorney to reprint a substituted brief, at their attorney's expense, to now conform to Rule 9(d) by including in the abstract photographic copies of all exhibits introduced in evidence, pointing out that appellees did not contend that the abstract was deficient.

At the outset,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases