1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 414 F.Supp.
  5. 414 F.Supp. 800 (1976)
 

UNITED STATES v. FRENCH

Crim. No. 76-76-D.

414 F.Supp. 800 (1976)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Larry FRENCH et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma.

May 5, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Russell, U. S. Atty., by Drew Neville and Duane H. Miller, Asst. U. S. Attys., Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

James A. Clark, Denver, Colo., for defendants Jacobs and Brutico.

ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS OF DEFENDANTS JACOBS AND BRUTICO

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

Defendants Jacobs and Brutico have moved this court to enter an order suppressing certain evidence pursuant to Rule 41 and Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on the ground that said evidence was the poisoned fruit of at least two illegal searches. On April 29, 1976, the court conducted an evidentiary hearing and based upon the evidence adduced therein finds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases