1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 413 F.Supp.
  5. 413 F.Supp. 693 (1976)
 

LEE v. JOSEPH E. SEAGRAM & SONS, INC.

No. 72 Civ. 232 (CHT).

413 F.Supp. 693 (1976)

Harold S. LEE et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH E. SEAGRAM & SONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

April 26, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Firm of Malcolm A. Hoffmann, New York City, for plaintiffs; Malcolm A. Hoffmann, Edward A. Woolley, Robert W. Biggar, Robert C. Agee, David Bender, New York City, of counsel.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant; MacDonald Flinn, E. Miles Prentice, III, Robert W. Mannix, New York City, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM

TENNEY, District Judge.

After a trial to a jury and a verdict for plaintiffs, defendant has brought on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

Facts

The three plaintiffs in this action, Harold Lee (now deceased) and his sons Eric and Lester Lee, owned a 50% interest in Capitol City Liquor Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases