HALL, Justice.
On this appeal from his conviction of five counts of armed robbery and one count of automobile theft, McVickers raises the single point that the verdict in each instance is contrary to the evidence and unsupported by sufficient evidence because he was inadequately identified as a robbery participant. The contention is without merit.
The state's evidence showed that on December 10, 1974, three young males, armed, entered David's Drive-In and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.