1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 413 F.Supp.
  5. 413 F.Supp. 613 (1976)
 

LUM v. CHINA AIRLINES CO., LTD.

Civ. No. 75-0085.

413 F.Supp. 613 (1976)

Andrew C. L. LUM et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHINA AIRLINES CO., LTD., a Taiwan Corporation, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

April 15, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert Takakashi, James A. King, Bouslog & Symonds, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs.

Hiroshi Oshiro, Daniel G. Heely, Chee, Hashimoto, Lee & Oshiro, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants.

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendant's threshold argument is that this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to review plaintiff's claim that the defendant, in his action of terminating the employment of the plaintiff, violated the plaintiff's rights as guaranteed under the Railway Labor Act § 2, Fourth. That section provides:

Fourth. Employees shall have the right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing. . . ....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases