HOVEL v. HOVEL

No. 45140.

226 N.W.2d 750 (1975)

Dale D. HOVEL, Respondent, v. Corrine M. HOVEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 7, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

West, Gowan, DeBoer & McIntosh and John S. Gowan, Rochester, for appellant.

Dingle & Suk and Robert G. Suk, Rochester, for respondent.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, PETERSON and TODD, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the records, briefs, and oral arguments of the parties on this appeal challenging the division of property adjudged below in a divorce action. We conclude that the underlying findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. Since our decision would have no precedential value, we affirm without extended opinion.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases