MONTGOMERY v. WRENN

No. 7518SC325.

217 S.E.2d 732 (1975)

27 N.C. App. 32

Nancy Johnson MONTGOMERY v. Doris A. WRENN and Allen Wrenn.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 3, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Carrington, Patterson, Follin & Curtis by Michael K. Curtis, Greensboro, for plaintiff appellant.

Henson, Donahue & Elrod by Richard L. Vanore, Greensboro, for defendant appellee.


ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error in excluding competent evidence relating to the extent of plaintiff's injuries. Plaintiff's contention is based on exclusions in her testimony and the testimony of Dr. Bittinger. Defendant argues that the exclusions were proper because the answers were not responsive.

Plaintiff contends error but does not make an attempt to show prejudice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases