1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 52 Cal.App.3d
  5. 52 Cal.App.3d 894 (1975)
 

ROGERS v. ULRICH

Docket No. 37152.

52 Cal.App.3d 894 (1975)

125 Cal. Rptr. 306

HAROLD ROGERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT ULRICH, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

November 10, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Harold Rogers, in pro. per., and Richard A. Arzino for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Richard J. Wylie, F. Kinsey Haffner and Wylie, Leahy, Blunt & McBride for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

CHRISTIAN, J.

Harold Rogers appeals from a judgment for the defense, rendered pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8, in this action for damages for recordation of a telephone conversation. Appellant sought damages from the City of San Jose and from Robert Ulrich because Ulrich, a city employee, had tape recorded, and allowed other persons to hear, portions of a telephone conversation between Rogers and Ulrich....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases