UNDERCOFLER, Presiding Justice.
1. This appeal is from the denial of a motion to vacate an interlocutory order directing the appellant "... to remove an existing fence in an easement alley ..." Appellant in his brief states the fence has been removed. Therefore, issues raised here questioning the validity of the order are moot.
2. Appellant has served his sentence for contempt and issues as to the validity of that order are moot. Cagle v. PMC Development...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.