1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 47 Cal.App.3d
  5. 47 Cal.App.3d 802 (1975)
 

WRIGHT v. WILLIAMS

Docket No. 45020.

47 Cal.App.3d 802 (1975)

121 Cal. Rptr. 194

ROGERS H. WRIGHT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. REED M. WILLIAMS, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

April 30, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Baltaxe, Rutkin, Kaplan & Klein and George Baltaxe for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Dunne, Shallcross & Kane, Russell E. Shallcross and Roy E. Harper for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

In this appeal from a judgment on respondent's-defendant's motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8 entered in plaintiffs'-appellants' action for legal malpractice, appellants contend that the trial court applied an overly restricted standard of duty owed by respondent to appellants. (1) We conclude that appellants having failed to offer expert testimony defining the standard of duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases