1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 389 F.Supp.
  5. 389 F.Supp. 433 (1975)
 

DAYTON v. BOEING COMPANY

Civ. No. 3198.

389 F.Supp. 433 (1975)

James DAYTON and Gwen Dayton, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. The BOEING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division.

February 11, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. L. Overfelt, Great Falls, Mont., Jack R. Harper, Helena, Mont., for plaintiffs.

Alexander, Kuenning, Miller & Ugrin, Great Falls, Mont., for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

RUSSELL E. SMITH, Chief Judge.

The question, submitted upon an agreed statement, is whether by reason of workmen's compensation and occupational disease coverage plaintiff may maintain this action.

Plaintiff James Dayton (Dayton) seeks damages for injuries sustained by him as a result of his exposure to electromagnetic pulses and laser radiations while employed by the defendant. His wife, Gwen Dayton, seeks damages for loss of consortium...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases