1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 531 P.2d
  5. 531 P.2d 288 (1975)
 

VERMENT v. NORDSTROM-BEST

531 P.2d 288 (1975)

In the matter of the Compensation of Arthur Lee VERMENT, Claimant. Arthur Lee Verment, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM-BEST, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 4, 1975.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1975.

Review Denied March 27, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan M. Scott, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Gary M. Galton and Galton & Popick, Portland.

Richard William Davis, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lindsay, Nahstoll, Hart, Duncan, Dafoe & Krause, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.

FOLEY, Judge.

Claimant was employed as a shoe salesman for Nordstrom-Best, Inc., and suffered an on-the-job injury to his right arm and shoulder on May 6, 1971. His claim was accepted and he received treatment for this injury, including surgical excision of the long head of the right biceps tendon. About December 1972, approximately 19 months after the arm-shoulder injury, claimant first notified employer's insurance carrier that he was suffering from back pain which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases