1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 400 F.Supp.
  5. 400 F.Supp. 357 (1975)
 

RAYNOR v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., INC.

Civ. A. No. 75-0273-R.

400 F.Supp. 357 (1975)

William R. RAYNOR v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

September 17, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry A. Conner, Jr., Richmond, Va., for plaintiff.

Michael W. Smith, Richmond, Va., James J. Baldwin, Greenville, S. C., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

WARRINER, District Judge.

Defendant Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company has moved the Court to dismiss plaintiff William R. Raynor's cause of action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction.

Plaintiff instituted this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. which makes age discrimination employment practices against persons ages 40 to 65 unlawful. Plaintiff, age 42...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases