1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 403 F.Supp.
  5. 403 F.Supp. 353 (1975)
 

SHOUSE v. PIERCE COUNTY

No. 165-73C3.

403 F.Supp. 353 (1975)

Jack SHOUSE et al., Plaintiffs, v. PIERCE COUNTY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Washington.

November 6, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard B. Sanders, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Mark L. Bubenik, Tacoma, Wash., for defendants.

Before KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, and BOWEN and BEEKS, District Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs seek a declaration that Sections 36.94.2301 and .2402 of the Revised Code of Washington are unconstitutional insofar as they permit only owners of real property to divest the action of county commissioners in the formation of the Utility Local Improvement District (ULID). As non-land owning residents within the ULID created by defendants,3

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases