1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 68 N.J.
  5. 68 N.J. 1 (1975)
 

HERBSTMAN v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

68 N.J. 1 (1975)

342 A.2d 181

CLIFFORD N. HERBSTMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 1, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edwin K. Large, Jr. argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Large, Scammell & Danziger, attorneys; Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, of counsel).

Mr. Clifford N. Herbstman argued the cause pro se.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

Clifford N. Herbstman, a member of the bar of this State who appeared pro se, filed a complaint in the Hunterdon County District Court in which he charged that the defendant Eastman-Kodak Company ("Kodak") sold him a new Kodak Pocket Instamatic No. 40 camera through a retail dealer, and that the defendant impliedly warranted the camera was merchantable and reasonably fit for the purposes for which it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases