1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 111 Ariz.
  5. 111 Ariz. 578 (1975)
 

DODSON v. BADE

No. 11666-PR.

111 Ariz. 578 (1975)

535 P.2d 1051

Colin W. DODSON and Etta Louise Dodson, husband and wife, James Charles Carruth and Sarah Virginia Carruth, husband and wife, Edwin T. Kay and Nancy B. Kay, husband and wife, John T. Hamilton III, Homer A. Dodge and Ardes K. Dodge, husband and wife, Fort Lowell Park Apartments, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Henry Kaldenbaugh and Elizabeth H. Kaldenbaugh, husband and wife, William N. Rosecrans and Jennie L. Rosecrans, husband and wife, Paul G. Rees, Jr. and Donna S. Rees, husband and wife, Everett Queen, Jr., and Charlotte G. Queen, husband and wife, Allan Elias and Margery Elias, husband and wife, and Robert L. Hale and Mary F. Hale, husband and wife, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Jack E. BADE, Pima County Assessor, James Lee Kirk, Pima County Treasurer, Dennis Weaver, Thomas S. Jay and James J. Murphy, as members of the Board of Supervisors of Pima County, Pima County, Arizona, a body politic, Pima County Board of Equalization, Board of Equalization of the State of Arizona, Arizona State Board of Property Tax Appeals and State of Arizona, a body politic, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

June 2, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hillock & Richards by Malcolm L. Hillock, Tucson, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., by James D. Winter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Beer & Kalyna by Olgerd W. Kalyna, Phoenix, for amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals in an unpublished memorandum decision on June 6, 1974, held, for the reasons stated in the court's opinion Hillock v. Bade, 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), that the action of the Pima County Assessor pursuant to a county, three-year, cyclical re-evaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases