1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 395 F.Supp.
  5. 395 F.Supp. 261 (1975)
 

HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. Nos. 72-3647, 72-3703.

395 F.Supp. 261 (1975)

HC&D MOVING & STORAGE COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants. De Witt Transfer & Storage Company, Intervening Defendants. De WITT TRANSFER & STORAGE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants. HC&D Moving & Storage Company, Inc., et al., Intervening Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

As Modified March 3, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan F. Wohlstetter, Stanley I. Goldman, Denning & Wohlstetter, Washington, D. C., A. Peter Howell, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs HC&D Moving & Storage Co., Inc., and others.

Thomas E. Kauper, Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Harold M. Fong, U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for United States.

Fritz R. Kahn, Gen. Counsel, Betty Jo Christian, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Robert G. Dodge, Kai, Dodge & Evensen, Honolulu, Hawaii, for all intervening defendants.

Warren N. Grossman, Los Angeles, Cal., F. Neil Aschemeyer, St. Louis, Mo., John C. Bradley, Washington, D. C., Herbert Burstein, New York City, Donald A. Morken, Minneapolis, Minn., Paul F. Sullivan, Washington, D. C., Joseph P. Tuohy, Chicago, Ill., James L. Beattey, Indianapolis, Ind., Charles Ephraim, Washington, D. C., for De Witt Transfer & Storage Co., and others.

Before BARNES, Circuit Judge, and PENCE and KING, District Judges.

These consolidated cases are actions for review of different portions of the decision of the Interstate Commerce Commission in Motor Carrier Operations in the State of Hawaii, 115 M.C.C. 228 (1972). By its decision, the Commission: (1) granted certificates of public convenience and necessity to 18 mainland-based household goods carriers authorizing operations within Hawaii; (2) determined that the previously exempt movement of household goods between points in Hawaii by carriers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases