1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 465 Pa.
  5. 465 Pa. 187 (1975)
 

STOTSENBURG v. FROST

465 Pa. 187 (1975)

348 A.2d 418

Ralph M. STOTSENBURG v. Richard H. FROST, Individually and as liquidator of Ralph M. Stotsenburg and Richard H. Frost, late trading as Autotrols, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Rehearing Denied December 30, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas P. Geer, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

R. Alan Stotsenburg, New York City, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

O'BRIEN, Justice.

These appeals arise from a final decree in equity affirmed by the court en banc, entered on March 25, 1974. This decree determined that a partnership did exist between appellant, Richard H. Frost, and appellee, Ralph M. Stotsenburg, and further awarded $8,984.81, plus interest, to appellee as his share of the liquidated partnership.

Two separate appeals having been filed, we shall discuss them ad seriatim.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases