1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 139 N.J.
  5. 139 N.J. Super. 373 (1975)
 

STATE v. SEIGEL

139 N.J. Super. 373 (1975)

354 A.2d 103

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SEIGEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal).

November 20, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gary S. Spagnola, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. C. Judson Hamlin, Prosecutor of Middlesex County, attorney).

Mr. Edward Bloch for defendant.

APPLEBY, J.S.C.

Defendant is charged with violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:115-1.8, the sale of obscene material, as defined by N.J.S.A. 2A:115-1.7, to persons under 18 years of age. It is defendant's contention that he cannot be found guilty under this statute because it is unconstitutional and void for being vague and indefinite, in violation of the N.J. Const. (1947), Art. I, par. 1, and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases