1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 389 F.Supp.
  5. 389 F.Supp. 84 (1975)
 

LEE v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 71-205-M.

389 F.Supp. 84 (1975)

Otis E. LEE, Sr. v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY et al.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

January 27, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David N. Kuryk, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff.

Fenton L. Martin, Baltimore, Md., for defendants Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company and The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company.

Norris W. Tingle, Baltimore, Md., and John O'B. Clarke, Jr., and Highsaw & Mahoney, Washington, D. C., for Lodge No. 176, Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, and Express and Station Employees, AFL-CIO.

MEMORANDUM

JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.

At the close of the plaintiff's case-in-chief in the trial of the above captioned matter, the court granted the defendants' motions for directed verdict.1 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-5(k), the defendants, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, and Lodge No. 176, Brotherhood of Railway...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases