1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 392 F.Supp.
  5. 392 F.Supp. 66 (1975)
 

DRS. MACHT, PODORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. GIRTON

No. C-1-74-463.

392 F.Supp. 66 (1975)

DRS. MACHT, PODORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Ronald GIRTON et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

March 7, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Vesper, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

John J. Cruze, Asst. U. S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

ORDER

HOGAN, District Judge.

Pending in this cause are two motions, the first being the motion of the plaintiff to remand the action to the state court in which it originated, and the second being the motion of the United States to quash the notice of garnishment. On this record, the facts are undisputed, and from these facts the following issues are presented for consideration.

1) Is a notice of garnishment a "civil action" removable under 28 U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases