1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 275 Md.
  5. 275 Md. 165 (1975)
 

BRIGHT v. UNSAT. C. & J. FUND BD.

[No. 190, September Term, 1974.]

275 Md. 165 (1975)

338 A.2d 248

BRIGHT ET AL. v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 3, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael I. Gordon, with whom was Robert R. Cohen on the brief, for appellants.

Robert P. Schlenger, with whom were Lord, Whip, Coughlan & Green, P.A., and John J. Corbley on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and O'DONNELL JJ.

DIGGES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Our task here is to construe whether the notice requirement of Maryland Code (1957, 1967 Repl. Vol.) Art. 66 1/2, § 154 (a) (4), now codified as Code (1957, 1970 Repl. Vol.) Art. 66 1/2, § 7-606 (a) (4), is mandatory rather than directory on a claimant who seeks permission to bring an action for damages against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board, presently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases