In this motion to suppress the evidence taken from a breathalyzer test of defendant, the fact pattern is apparently one of first impression, at least insofar as this court could find.
The defendant was arrested at 2:15 A.M. on the morning of May 9, 1974 after having been stopped by the police. For the purposes of this suppression hearing it was stipulated that the testing officer had probable cause to administer the breathalyzer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
