1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 68 N.J.
  5. 68 N.J. 286 (1975)
 

IN RE FRUCHTER

68 N.J. 286 (1975)

344 A.2d 320

IN THE MATTER OF LEONARD W. FRUCHTER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 12, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles M. Grossman for respondent (Messrs. Diamond, Grossman, Pitman, Udine & Anazaldi, attorneys).

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, for the Essex County Ethics Committee.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, a member of the Bar of this State, is presently under suspension by order of this Court. See: In re Fruchter, 64 N.J. 435 (1974). Following his suspension, an ethics complaint was filed against respondent charging him with the conversion of funds of the Estate of Meyer Gilenson, deceased. At about the same time a criminal accusation was filed against respondent by the Prosecutor of Essex County charging...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases