1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 135 N.J.
  5. 135 N.J. Super. 211 (1975)
 

STATE v. BATTAGLIA

135 N.J. Super. 211 (1975)

343 A.2d 103

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL BATTAGLIA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 17, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Rubino, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor argued the cause for the appellant (Joseph C. Woodcock, Jr., Prosecutor of Bergen County, attorney).

John J. Baldino argued the cause for the respondent (Calissi, Klinger, Cuccio & Baldino, attorneys).

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, LYNCH and ALLCORN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ALLCORN, J.A.D.

By the adoption of N.J.S.A. 24:21-27 the Legislature authorized the establishment of the suspension procedure for qualifying individuals charged with certain offenses under the Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, N.J.S.A. 24:21-1 et seq. That same section delineated the limits within which the suspension procedure might be used.

In language that is clear and unambiguous, eligibility...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases