1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 215 S.E.2d
  5. 215 S.E.2d 111 (1975)
 

STATE v. BROOKS

No. 76.

215 S.E.2d 111 (1975)

287 N.C. 392

STATE of North Carolina v. Howard BROOKS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Thomas L. Ringer, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Paul, Keenan, Rowan & Galloway by James V. Rowan, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant brings forward four questions based on five of the fourteen assignments of error properly noted in the record.

In Question # 1 (Assignments # 1 and # 3) defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to quash the warrants charging him with inciting a riot and engaging in a riot on the grounds that the statutes underlying these charges are unconstitutional on their face and as applied.

We begin our evaluation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases