DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. NAGLE-HART, INC.

No. 63 (1974).

70 Wis.2d 224 (1975)

234 N. W. 2d 350

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. NAGLE-HART, INC., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 28, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by E. Weston Wood, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondent there was a brief by Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen, and oral argument by Brian E. Butler, all of Madison.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

Initially, in its brief before the state tax appeals commission, the department took the position that the expenses involved were disallowed as being "contrary to public policy."1 The fact that such construction, based on such determination by the department of an appropriate public policy, was of long-standing and not countermanded by legislative enactment was contended to mean that "governmental authority in Wisconsin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases